No idea why it says so. ENAC is the party for which the information is collected.
Here is another aviosuperficie that has a detailed form for every flight, and the pilot has to await conformation after sending the form. At least this is a webform. The „briefing package“ is a mere 21 pages. Worse than some UK airfields…
Here is another airfield that uses essentially the same form as Bedizzole. It seems to be becoming some sort of standard used by many airfields.
As long as it can remain only a PN.
Some central actor like AOPA Italy should do a central webform for all where you fill all the needed informations and just select the aviosuperficie in question.
It‘s not a PN, it is always a permission. But that of course was also the case with the previous regulation. It‘s private land after all.
boscomantico wrote:
ENAC is the party for which the information is collected.
It seems they may have delegated some of that: I just received the below
[edited to add that I thought you were referring to airfield data, as required in the new regulation, not aircraft operator data, which I now realize is the case in your quote]
Avioportolano wrote:
ENAC / AVIOPORTOLANO AgreementHi ,
On 29 April 2024, ENAC and AVIOPORTOLANO formalised the agreement according to which the management and official publication of registered airfield and helipad data will take place through the AAI-Avioportolano Aeronautical Information portal accessible free of charge at www.webAAI.it.Site undergoing technical revision. With apologies to users, we would like to inform you that the AAI Avioportolano Aeronautical Information portal is temporarily suspended for updates about registered airfields and Helisurfaces following the adjustments provided for in the new Regulation on the liberalisation of the use of these landing areas.
Active and practicable registered airfields and helipads. We are awaiting ENAC authorization to shortly start publishing the official data of registered airfields and helipads currently active and practicable.
ENAC investigation status. The status of ongoing ENAC (National Civil Aviation Authority) enquiries will be indicated if not yet completed. Pilots and operators will therefore be able to follow the progress of ENAC enquiries and access the data and information of the infrastructures for which ENAC has given Avioportolano authorisation to publish.
Plates and Avioportolano data sheets. The publication on the AAI portal of the plates and data sheet concerning the registered airfields produced by Avioportolano is temporarily suspended in order to carry out the necessary updates.
Updates to navigation software. The plates and data sheets produced by Avioportolano currently present on Sky Demon, Air Navigation Pro, Airmate, Foreflight, Garmin Pilot and RoketRoute will be updated with the entry into force of the 06/2024 amendment and will therefore be available for consultation from 13 June 2024.
@Peter it seems the link embedded in the text copied from my email in the above text works, without using the forum’s “link” markers, interesting!
Yes, it will probably be a good thing having this information published by Avioportolano rather than ENAC. We shall see.
We are awaiting ENAC authorization to shortly start publishing the official data of registered airfields and helipads currently active and practicable.
That doesn‘t sound like it will be anytime soon though…
Whilst waiting for the new database, we can already see the many „casualties“ of the new regulation by consulting the old ENAC database. See here: https://avio-superfici.enac.gov.it/it
All the „red“ ones have been cancelled by ENAC now, so all flying (except microlight) is now forbidden at these sites. This includes several beautiful and useful airfields where I have been to myself, like:
Corte de Droso (Puglia)
Macri (Puglia)
Aeroclub Piacenza (Emiglia-Romagna)
Sezze (Lazio)
Massalengo (Lombardia)
San Giovanni Rotondo (Puglia)
plus several more.
Now:
Still, this clean-up action brings many casualties, which is really sad.
Thanks for the latest update and link @boscomantico
It is more than sad, it is a 🤬 tragedy…