Menu Sign In Contact FAQ
Banner
Welcome to our forums

Why doing a "337 for everything" is not a good idea (N-reg)

The info on the definition of changing weight and balance is particularly interesting. You might need to do a new W&B check after an alteration without having affected weight and balance limits, and therefore not having made a major alternation by that definition.

Here is another article from the same source

Too damn right!

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

This US AOPA article highlights a common practice where A&Ps write out a 337 for just about everything and it gives everybody a warm feeling. It’s usually going to be completely wrong, not least because a 337 has to be backed by an STC or Field Approval related documents.

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom
3 Posts
Sign in to add your message

Back to Top