Timothy wrote:
or has lead
So while we’re at it: polluting 100LL vintage technology vs. environment friendly modern engines – namely Rotax 
europaxs wrote:
So while we’re at it: polluting 100LL vintage technology
Many (if not most) engines built for 100LL can run on 91/96UL.
Those who only trust in-panel devices which have been anointed by the high-priests in Oklahoma City vs the infidels who worship the tablet gods…
europaxs wrote:
environment friendly modern engines – namely Rotax
And those technically educated vs. those who believe a Rotax 9xx is a modern engine.
In terms of Lycontisaurus – well. You don’t need to be an engineer to be able to judge. Had a closer look at the 915 iS at the AERO?
europaxs wrote:
Had a closer look at the 915 iS at the AERO?
Professionaly.
That an O360 is an old engine doesn’t make a Rotax a modern one.
Spamcans vs. Composite
mh wrote:
doesn’t make a Rotax a modern one
Of course not if compared with a modern car engine. However, we’re talking about certified and available aircraft engines.
QED
Le2q-ists and real cross channeler
