AndersB wrote:
No other examples in Sweden, than ESTA
There are a whole bunch of 01/19 with actual QFUs that would call for the next decimal up or down.
Jönköping ESGJ, Linköping/Malmen ESCF (not that it’s a problem for us in GA), Karlstad ESOK should be 02/20.
AndersB wrote:
No other examples in Sweden, than ESTA? I have a vauge memory there are more..???
One other example is Göteborg/Landvetter (ESGG).
No other examples in Sweden, than ESTA? I have a vauge memory there are more..???
Weirdly I sometimes mix up east and west (no problem with N/S, L/R or P/S). Rounding one runway number makes sense to avoid this kind of problem. One consideration is that I was taught in the PPL to check/set the gyrocompas against the runway heading, but this wouldn’t happen very often, and a ~5° error would be easily lost in other factors anyway.
Quick search turned up Elk City:
Operational restrictions:
IS A CURVED RWY.
RUNWAY 14
RUNWAY 35
I’ve never heard of opposite runways that aren’t 180° apart.
Stoke is 400m strip in UK show 24/06 but not 180deg
Something to due with Riemann geometry 
I used to fly PA18 there from Damyns Hall and I heard someone mentioning doing 180 impossible turn in his C42, given that everything around has better surface than the airfield, I failed to see the point? and it’s not 180deg, it’s 270deg for “straight runways” and in this case it’s 250deg or 290deg depending on left or right
Here is one :) https://twitter.com/AeroSkippah/status/969629277275742208
Clipperstorch wrote:
Like 02/19 or 03/21?
I’ve never heard of opposite runways that aren’t 180° apart.
I think that ESTA (ÄNGELHOLM) is such an example. 14/32 iso 13/31.
Pretend that they are oriented differently
Like 02/19 or 03/21?
