It does not matter in Europe but in the US the M600 and now M700 seemed very popular among older pilots with medial issues. It was about the biggest plane to qualify for what they call “basic med”.
I don’t think that is a big factor. Almost nobody will fly a pressurized SET at <FL180 due to range decrease.
The Piper will prob be a lot less to maintain, Daher are not known for their friendly pricing.
Urban legend. New TBMs come with 5 year free MX.
Sure, it’s priced in.
Maintenance cost on an M600 isn’t much different.
The Piper will prob be a lot less to maintain, Daher are not known for their friendly pricing.
The TBM is 6.2 max, but will normally give you 6.0 at the ceiling, which is a 9800ft cabin.
arj1 wrote:
Or was your focus not the actual ceiling but the cabin comfort?
Yes in the PA46 at FL300 the cabin altitude is a bit over 10.000ft. The PT6 engine is pulling strong but that shows the hull with 5.5 psi was really designed for FL250 and not FL300. It works ok but at over 4 million dollars you might want to ask for the industry stamdard maximum 8000ft cabin altitude. So if they eventually want to expand into a M800 or M900 a new cabin will be required. The Epic is certified up to FL340 so this would be the opportunity to go the full way to FL350 or so and beat the competition.
Well, Sebastian, TBMs & PC-12 are limited to FL310/FL300 ceiling too. Could it be some certification limit? Or was your focus not the actual ceiling but the cabin comfort?
RobertL18C wrote:
which in this case don’t look designed by the bookkeeping department!
The only think is maybe the hull. Piper did design a completely new wing for the M600 and M700 while the M500 wing is an updated version dating back to the very old PA46-310. But the hull is more or less still the same since the very beginning which means it can do only 5.5 psi differential pressure. The M500/600/700 are certified up to FL300 and in that case the 5.5 psi is really at the limit of what is acceptable. I think the TBM has got 6.5 psi which is probably what it should be.
It sure is pretty airplane, appearing well balanced.
By SET standards this type seems not to have serious vices. No strakes, stall fences, stick pusher, etc
Piper are masters of recycling components in updated competitive designs, which in this case don’t look designed by the bookkeeping department!
Sebastian_G wrote:
Yes and that is at MTOW. With less load it should perform even better.
Sure thing! But, of course the MTOW/MLW data is how performance is presented and comparisons are commonly made. Not to forget these data are based on all operational set conditions being met (and preferably understood by the pilot!) – no room for discrepancies.
It sure is pretty airplane, appearing well balanced.
Antonio wrote:
as in….?
I read 4.1 million USD before extras and taxes. TBM 960 seems to be about 5.15 million USD. But there must be a big profit in there for Piper. I can not imagine this engine beeing so much more expensive than the previous PT6A-42A engine and the rest is more or less the same. As the M600 was about 3.5 million there is probably half a million extra profit for Piper ;-)
Impressive runway performance numbers
Yes and that is at MTOW. With less load it should perform even better.
It does not matter in Europe but in the US the M600 and now M700 seemed very popular among older pilots with medial issues. It was about the biggest plane to qualify for what they call “basic med”.
