Direct competition with Trig etc.
They look simple and good!
@wigglyamp, are these much better than the previous GTR/GNC?
Or is it the same product but with colour display?
Yeager wrote:
They look simple and good!
yep, very attractive… unfortunately the retail price not as much…
Yeager wrote:
Direct competition with Trig etc.
They look simple and good!
They seem nicer than the boxes they replace (GTR255 and GNC255) but also slightly more expensive so they don’t really change the competition situation visavi Trig, do they?
Details off another forum, as published by G3xpert Justin:
Here are the high points:
GNC 215 offers adds a NAV radio with the additional features:
The GTR 205 is priced at $2,695 and the GNC 215 is priced at $5,295. Orders can be placed with your Garmin Dealer now and we expect to begin shipping in March. These radios replace the GTR 225 and GNC 255.
They seem nicer than the boxes they replace (GTR255 and GNC255) but also slightly more expensive so they don’t really change the competition situation visavi Trig, do they?
In the US market, a lot of people have been and are using GTR200s at $1575 instead as a simple comm radio, in certified aircraft. I understand they work better than the GTR255, have a good built-in 2-place intercom and notwithstanding Garmin’s listing of them as “Experimental” there is no regulatory restriction with installing on on a certified plane if it doesn’t need a TSO’d radio. The issue for Europe is that they are 760 channel, not 2280 channel.
Airborne_Again wrote:
Silvaire wrote:
The issue for Europe is that they are 760 channel, not 2280 channel.
From the specs at Garmin it states:
“Communication channels: 760 with 25 kHz spacing; 2280 channels with 8.33 kHz spacing”
They seem nicer than the boxes they replace (GTR255 and GNC255) but also slightly more expensive so they don’t really change the competition situation visavi Trig, do they?
Only, in that they look better! So, if they look better than the previous (Garmin) model and the Trig´s look the same (since they haven´t changed) – that would change the competition situation vs Trig, no?
Most things come at a price – even looks! ;-)
Dan wrote:
yep, very attractive… unfortunately the retail price not as much…
If you expect this equipment to last say 20 years – the difference is not really significant, if one finds that they fits better in the current cockpit environment. I actually don´t think they would on my old Rallye – and probably many other similar aged aircraft – they have a bit to much of a modern appearance, lacking the nostalgic progressive update looks of the likes of Trig´s stacks.. ;-)
From the specs at Garmin it states:
“Communication channels: 760 with 25 kHz spacing; 2280 channels with 8.33 kHz spacing”
My comment was in relation to the $1575 Garmin GTR200 com plus intercom radio, for which the specs appear to be as follows, with 25 MHz or 760 channel capability.
Sorry to detail the thread!
the difference is not really significant, if one finds that they fits better in the current cockpit environment
Yes, I need to be more precise… the new Navcom would be a super fit to my current cockpit environment, no doubt. But scaling the price to replace my existing 225A for a colorized enhancement of my flying working space measured against my revenue reveals a ridiculously low ROI.
PS
OTOH life’s not getting any longer