Menu Sign In Contact FAQ
Banner
Welcome to our forums

ADF Holds - Anticipating inbound track to the fix

Looks like the ADF will still be a bain of many people's IMC / IR training and validation then :-)

You would be suprised at how real-world a JAA IR revalidation flight can be - with the right sort of instructor i.e. one who flies for real.

You are very unlikely to be doing NDB holds and, if you are, unlikely to be doing them using anything other than the GPS.

What the IMCR reval is like I don't know because I get that signed off at the same time as the IR (and also get the PPL reval done then).

It's just the initial (IRT) which can have all this stuff, and you can't know what you will get.

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

Unfortunately, there are no such approaches in the UK at the moment, to my knowledge.

I think EGMD (Lydd) ones don't need the NDB at all. Just had a look...

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

I think EGMD (Lydd) ones don't need the NDB at all. Just had a look...

Thanks Peter ;)

Let's hope that more procedures adopt this... er... approach.

I will ask matspart3 next time I see him, to understand why Gloucestershire uses the NDB in its missed approach.

EGBJ / Gloucestershire

Thanks for all answers :)

(Did my IR PC this morning - NDB holding and approach + ILS Approach in 900 foot broken. With and without autopilot in a C172 G1000. Refreshing and fun :) )

ESOW Västerås, Sweden

to understand why Gloucestershire uses the NDB in its missed approach.

Shoreham EGKA was forced to do the same thing.

The excuse, according to internet rumour is that if the GPS fails, you can go missed back to the NDB.

Can't really argue with that, can you?

It's a bit like arguing against CRB checks for schoolteachers...

Matspart3 has been here too, though he probably does not "live" here.

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

A response from the EGBJ manager, authorised for posting here, regarding why there is an NDB in the GPS/RNAV missed approach:

I'm taking this up with DAP at present but its absolutely right. The approach (sic) back in 2003? was that there needed to be a terrestrial aid but I'm seeing if the policy has changed. Watch this space!

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

I don't think I would destroy the panel layout by installing a 1950s ADF.

The 1950s ADF complements the 1950s Lycosaurus very nicely.

ESSB, Stockholm Bromma
47 Posts
Sign in to add your message

Back to Top