Menu Sign In Contact FAQ
Banner
Welcome to our forums

FAA IFR Currency - exact requirements for the 6/6 IR rolling currency (merged)

Was doing a few instrument approaches today for practice and for FAA currency…

Has anyone ever really figured out what is intended by

“intercepting and tracking courses through the use of navigational electronic systems”

I mean, I do log that in order to be compliant, but in reality, when flying instrument approaches we do exactly that all the time, so it does seem totally redundant…

Mainz (EDFZ) & Egelsbach (EDFE), Germany

Allow me to add to that the other controversial bit: holding patterns.

The full requirement is:

  • 6 instrument approaches
  • Holding procedures
  • Intercepting and tracking courses through the use of navigation systems

Very very few instrument approaches involve flying a hold. That must be even more true in the USA. So, the 6/6 FAA IR currency cannot be used by US based pilots either

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

Yes, but you can just fly a hold anywhere. Doesn’t need to be part of a pn approach procedure.

Plus the first and the second are not redundant. The first and the third are.

Mainz (EDFZ) & Egelsbach (EDFE), Germany

Any IFR flight involves intercepting and tracking courses unless it is a UK ‘freestyle’ IFR flight. I can’t imagine that is a problem. As to holds – we are talking one every six months. I get enough through normal approaches but if not just do one twice a year.

EGTK Oxford

“intercepting and tracking courses through the use of navigational electronic systems”

I think this is more relevant in the US where you often get clearances involving intercepting radials.

The nearest I’ve ever come to that in Europe is intercepting a localiser as part of a vectored ILS or a DME arc and the instruction I get most of the time when I fly to Biggin Hill: “Direct LAM leave LAM heading 180”.

I guess either of those meets the letter of the definition.

EGSC

Yes, but my point is: even any kind of approach meets that definition.
So why does it exist, in addition to the “six approaches” thing?

Mainz (EDFZ) & Egelsbach (EDFE), Germany

As to holds – we are talking one every six months

One every 6m or six every 6m?

Administrator
Shoreham EGKA, United Kingdom

This is why pretty well everyone focuses on the 6 approaches. The other are essentially embedded IMHO.

EGTK Oxford

The number of holds is not specified, so one would suffice.

Mainz (EDFZ) & Egelsbach (EDFE), Germany

Tracking and intercepting is interpreted by everyone I know over there to be flying an IFR route which must involve getting onto a course and flying it.

EGTK Oxford
134 Posts
Sign in to add your message

Back to Top